Money Makes the World Go Round (Let’s Make Money reviewed)

Thursday, 1 October 2009, 23:52 | Category : Film Diary, Loaves, Other European film industries
Tags : , , , ,

{FILM DIARY}

I re-watched Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, as well as Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix relatively recently, but as I have nothing particularly new to add I’m not going to review them again ;-P Prisoner of Azkaban is still fab to me - I enjoy it a lot every time I see it. Besides, until the Half-Blood Prince DVD makes it into my collection, it’s my best option when I’m on Tom Felton phases ;) (in case somebody’s wondering - at this point in time I’m over my Tom Felton phase and presently on a Colin Firth one *grin*). Order of the Phoenix on the other hand seems worse every time I view it ;-P Mind you, I did see it soon after re-reading the 5th HP book, so maybe that’s why it seemed particularly bad… But even the acting seemed kind of blah this time round (and I always thought that was one of the 5th film’s strong points).

Let's Make Money (Austria, 2008)

Seen: Thursday, 17th September 2009 (cinema)
Runtime: 110′
Director: Erwin Wagenhofer
Production House: Allegro Film
Plot: A documentary about how the global economy works.

Trailer

Impressions In Short
Fascinating material, but a bad film.

More About the Film
The problem I have with this film is that I have absolutely no idea what the director’s point was. I mean I know the director is clearly very left wing, but I think his material only partly supports his beliefs :]
Some of the problems described in the film would have indeed been solved by socialist economic policies, but the solution to the problems of African economies is clearly (according to his own material) for Western countries to further liberalize their markets (a very right wing policy). And there were some problems which would have been better solved by changing policies which don’t have much to do with how the market works. For example in the parts about India he was using an interview which criticized government policies as not being socialist enough, but the policies under fire had more to do with welfare than economy.
There was no clear line of argumentation in the film and I felt that was a very major flaw. Perhaps the reason for this was that in actuality it should not have been one film, but about five or six films. Each of the issues presented in the film was so big and interesting that it could have been a feature length film in itself.
There was the issue of tax havens like Jersey and Singapore. In particular the material from Jersey was amazing. The mayor’s speeches were like something from Monty Python and the stories about people doing those accounting jobs in Jersey and hating it were great. The problem was they weren’t elaborated on more, they were just kind of mentioned in passing.
India’s capitalism, its attraction to foreign investors and the growing divide between the middle class and the poor is something I already know a bit about and he barely scratched the surface. It’s a really broad topic.
He got some great material out of Burkina Faso as well. There were some very interesting points made - basically according to the numbers, most of Africa’s problems could probably be solved without resolving to financial aid if they were only given fair prices for their produce. But again, I wished the topic had been delved into more.
The ghost estates and even towns in Spain - houses built only to attract capital and never inhabited… it’s quite a story as well. The government ends up with huge financial losses while private investors earn lots of money.
Perhaps the one story, which wouldn’t quite stand up on its own was that of the trams in Vienna and how a stupid privatization decision means that Vienna no longer owns its trams. It has to pay a yearly fee to an American company to be able to use them. Still, privatization is a pretty big topic and I think the material would have faired better if it had been a part of a slightly different film…
Where he hit solid gold was the topic of “economic hitmen” and the World Bank. For this alone the film is worth seeing. He presents pretty strong arguments that the war in Iraq actually happened because Saddam Hussain wanted to sell oil for a currency other than US dollars. It sounds like a conspiracy theory, but the freaky thing is it sort of makes sense. Doing a mere 20min (or was it less?) on a topic like this is just silly. If someone made a good feature length film on this it would be a major worldwide hit - it’s a story that really needs to be told!

Recommended?
I feel the film is poor, but the content (particularly the economic hitmen bit) is what in the end makes it worth watching for me. So I’ll recommend it for that :)

FILM SPOTTING: WFF 2009 edition | Part One

{FILM SPOTTING}

I’m not sure if there will be a part two of my WFF film spotting, but there might be ;-P Won’t have time to attend the Warsaw Film Festival properly this year or to read through exactly what they’re showing, but here’s some stuff that caught my eye immediately, just by looking at the titles released so far (a full list is supposed to be up tomorrow).

The Girlfriend Experience (USA, 2009)

Release Date (Poland): None - WFF might be the only opportunity to see it.
Runtime: 78′
Director: Steven Soderbergh
Cast: Sasha Grey
Production House: 2929 Productions, Extension 765, HDNet Films
Plot: (from imdb)

A drama set in the days leading up to the 2008 Presidential election, and centered on a high-end Manhattan call girl meeting the challenges of her boyfriend, her clients, and her work.

Featurette

The sceptical part of me thinks that…
I’m not particularly into Soderbergh and it’s only had average reviews. The topic seems rather cliché as well.

The excited part of me thinks that…
I’ve been really looking forward to watching this because of Sasha Grey. I should probably explain my fixation with her… I once watched her on the Tyra Banks show on youtube (I don’t even remember how I came across that clip). The show was clearly orchestrated to show how the sex industry is luring young, naive and innocent girls and destroying their lives. For most of the guests it was true, but Tyra made a mistake when she invited Sasha Grey to the show. I think Sasha was 18 at the time (she’s 22 now), but however Tyra Banks tried to manipulate and prove her point (and she clearly did her best with the editing of Sasha’s interview as well), Sasha Grey just wasn’t having any of it. She chose the career of a porn star very consciously and she is totally honest and unapologetic about it. There’s something about how bluntly and forcefully she makes her opinions known that really impresses me. I’ve since read and watched quite a few of her interviews and I just love her *grin* Haven’t seen any of her porn films - don’t feel particularly inclined to, but now that she’s starting a mainstream acting career alongside her adult film one I just have to see her *grin*

Świnki (Germany/Poland, 2009)

Release Date (Poland): None yet - I assume this will be released though… just hasn’t gotten a distributor quite yet
Runtime: 94′
Director: Robert Glinski
Cast: Filip Garbacz
Production House: 42film
Plot: A story about teenage prostitutes on the Polish-German border.

Trailer

The sceptical part of me thinks that…
Actually there are no specific things that put me off…

The excited part of me thinks that…
The topic, though sensationalistic, looks interesting. The boy on the trailer looks fantastic and has been much praised for the part. And it sounds like Robert Gliński may have done something on the level of Cześć Tereska again, though I guess I will have to watch it to find out *grin*

Mammoth (Sweden/Denmark/Germany, 2009)

Release Date (Poland): None AFAIK and I’ve no idea if this will be released…
Runtime: 125′
Director: Lukas Moodysson
Cast: Gael García Bernal, Michelle Williams
Production House: Memfis Film
Plot: (from imdb)

While on a trip to Thailand, a successful American businessman tries to radically change his life. Back in New York, his wife and daughter find their relationship with their live-in Filipino maid changing around them. At the same time, in the Philippines, the maid’s family struggles to deal with her absence.

Trailer

The sceptical part of me thinks that…
There’s nothing about the trailer and nothing that I’ve heard about it that has gotten me excited.

The excited part of me thinks that…
It’s Lukas Moodysson and Gael Garcia Bernal together. I absolutely loved Moodysson’s first three films, the ones I’ve seen after that not so much… I really do like to follow him though cause he’s chosen a bizarre path for himself!
Gael Garcia Bernal is one of those guys who not only I like as an actor, but who usually chooses some interesting projects, so he must have had his reasons to choose this one *grin*

Duplicate - one of Shahrukh’s craziest comedies

{FILM DIARY}

Duplicate (India, 1998)

Seen: Saturday, 12th September 2009 (DVD, repeat viewing)
Runtime: 158′
Director: Mahesh Bhatt
Cast: Shahrukh Khan, Juhi Chawla, Sonali Bendre, Farida Jalal, Kajol (cameo)
Production House: Dharma Productions
Plot: Bablu is a very sweet guy who works as a cook and Manu is an evil and perverted gangster. The problem is that they both look the same…

Trailer

Impressions In Short
90s Bollywood at its best - cheesy, corny and totally shameless about it ;)

More About the Film
Something that strikes me about it every time I see it is how absolutely packed with sex it is! I mean on the one hand it totally abides by all the old-fashioned Bollywood boundaries of what you can show and what you cannot, which means it should be rather mild by Western standards… only it’s not ;) I mean just check out this song (it’s a comedic sequence - the evil boy gets the good girl and the good boy ends up with the evil girl). No where does it cross the unspoken rules of 90s Bollywood decency and yet it is quite simply naughty ;) And the scissors scene at the beginning of the film totally gets me every time. I seriously think that’s Shahrukh’s most erotic scene ever *grin* (and he doesn’t even take any of his clothes off!).
Sex aside, it’s a really hilarious movie. It’s comedy almost the whole way through and it gets to total absurdity. I naturally adore Shahrukh’s evil incarnation in the film, but I love Sonali Bendre in it too. I haven’t found a good way to explain why exactly I have a thing for Sonali Bendre, but lets just say she’s cheap and vulgar in a really cute way *grin*

Recommended?
I think you have to have a taste for B movies - if you’re only into high brow stuff then you’d be better off leaving this off your watchlist. The trailer should give you a good indication of what kind of humour and standard it is *grin* If you think the trailer looks fun then you’re probably going to enjoy the film.
It’s a definite must for anybody who enjoys Shahrukh in his evil mode *grin*

Today is the International Day of Peace! :)

The Day After Peace is a film that had a huge impact on me. Ever since I watched it (which was in October last year), I promised myself that I would somehow support the efforts of Peace Day.
The 21st of September is a very special day because it aims to be a day of global ceasefire. This allows for help to come to regions to which it is otherwise impossible to get to. The day still doesn’t work quite the way it’s meant to, but it has had some great success stories and every year seems to get it closer to attaining the goal of making the ceasefire global. It would be amazing if the goal was eventually met!

Anyway, having decided that this is a day that really needs to be celebrated, I had trouble figuring out how I should celebrate it exactly. And well, the first answer that came to me was by writing about it… Ok, I know that’s kind of lame, but what this day needs the most is for more people to hear about it and this seems like the most natural thing I can do to help it along.
The other thing that occurred to me was that most people (including myself) actually have no idea about the wars that are currently taking place. So I figured that if I’m going to do a blog post on the International Day of Peace every year, I may as well inform myself and hopefully other people as well about some of these wars.
This year I’m going to be a bit lazy (I’m using my BA project as my excuse) and I’m going to write about a war I already know quite a bit about, so brace yourself for yet another post about Afghanistan! :) This one is going to be very long, but hopefully informative also.

Al-Qaeda and the Taliban are not the same thing

Most people I come across (unless they’re very young) have a good idea of how this war started. But so far, the only person I spoke to about this, who seemed to understand whom this war is being waged against is Kin. She is the only person, who replied “That’s obvious!” when I told her Al-Qaeda and the Taliban are totally different groups. I’ve come across some very smart and even politically involved people, who were very surprised to hear this. The way the media are covering the story, Al-Qaeda and the Taliban sound like two names for the same militant group. They’re very far from being the same thing, so I figured this is the first thing that really needs explaining.

Who are the Taliban?
Afghanistan is an ethnically diverse country. It has three main ethnic groups - the Pashtuns, the Tajiks and the Hazara. The Pashtuns in particular have a very strong tribal culture. Every Pashtun village has elders known as the Jirga. All Pashtun tribes abide by an honour code called the Pashtunwali - a code, which actually pre-dates Islam.
The Taliban are a militant group that was born from Pashtun tribal culture. They basically mixed and abberrated the principles of Pashtunwali and Islam, creating a very extreme concept of what the country should be - a concept which is actually totally against the principles guiding both Islam and Pashtunwali. They are predominantly Pashtun, which is not to say that all Pashtun tribes support them.
They started coming to power in the 1990s and overthrew the government in Kabul in 1996. Afghanistan was under their governance until 2001 when the US invaded the country.

Who are Al-Qaeda?
Under Taliban rule, Afghanistan was a great place for Islamic terrorist groups to train and regroup. Even if they operated in a completely different part of the world, they would come to Afghanistan to train and plan their actions undisturbed. All extreme Muslim groups were welcome there. Eventually, the United States put their foot down and started exerting pressure on the Taliban government to ban terrorist groups from the country. The Taliban bowed to the pressure and banned all terrorist groups except for… you guessed it - Al-Qaeda. Osama bin Laden saw his chance - he told all the other terrorist groups that if they united under the Al-Qaeda banner, they could continue their own agendas much as they had until now. The catch was that they had to go through with bin Laden’s agenda too. Most of them agreed to the conditions. From a small terrorist group, Al-Qaeda suddenly became a huge terrorist organization, which spanned not just countries, but continents.

Don’t these two groups have any sort of overlap?
I remember reading an estimate, which said the CIA thought there may have been up to 41 people who belonged to both groups at the time the US invaded Afghanistan. So the overlap was considered completely insignificant at the time. Nowadays I think they estimate the overlap might be a bit larger, but it is still very foolish of the media to portray them as one group. They are two groups with two completely different agendas - the Taliban want power over Afghanistan and Al-Qaeda want to wage “global jihad”.

Who are the USA and NATO fighting in Afghanistan?
Al-Qaeda, by its very nature, is a group that should be fought with intelligence, not military force. They do not have a specific area of operation or a conventional military structure. Furthermore, considering that this war has been going on for almost 8 years now, I’d say it’s foolish to believe that any senior Al-Qaeda members are still in Afghanistan. All they can do against Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan right now is gather intelligence, which is the supposed purpose of CIA secret prisons, Guantanamo and other such places.
So, I guess the answer to that question is the Taliban.

Why are they fighting?

The simple answer, the one that most people know is because the US invaded Afghanistan after 9/11. But I think it would be worth elaborating a little further on that…

Why can’t the US and NATO just withdraw at this point?
If the Taliban get back into power in Afghanistan, Afghanistan will become a breeding spot for terrorism again. In fact, the situation is likely to be worse than before. Tension between the Muslim and Western world has grown significantly since 2001.
Furthermore, the Taliban were one of the most oppressive governments in world history. The atrocities committed against women, other ethnic groups and the extreme forms of censorship they put into practice are so gruesome they are sometimes hard to imagine or even believe.

Why the Taliban are unlikely to give up?
Afghanistan and particularly the Pashtuns have a very long history of putting up strong resistance against outside invaders. This legacy started as long ago as during Alexander the Great’s invasion of Asia and the Middle East (apparently, he spent more time fighting in Afghanistan than in the rest of his campaign put together) and has continued throughout the whole of Afghanistan’s history (a recent example being Afghanistan’s war with the Soviet Union).

Atrocities committed by the US and NATO

War and human rights never go hand in hand. Throughout this war, the USA’s track record in human rights has taken some significant blows. NATO is not without fault either.

US Detention Centres
Imagine that one day somebody grabs you on the street. You are put into detention, tortured, serious accusations are made against you, but you are not allowed to contact your family or a lawyer to help you. A couple of years later you are released, you are not given any sort of apology or a sufficient explanation for why you were held. Once you are back in your country and community, everybody treats you like a terrorist and wants nothing to do with you. The very idea that their country is taking in people who have gone through this scares them. You try to sue the people who did this to you, but even there you face difficulties.
This is the plight of hundreds of Muslims all over the world today.
Amongst these cases there are those who were underage at the time of capture. A much talked about case is Omar Khadr - a Canadian citizen who was put in detention in 2002 at the age of 15 and remains in Guantanamo to this day. No charges have been pressed against him in court. More recently, an Afghan man is seeking justice - he says he was kept in detention by the Americans for many years despite being 12 at the time of his capture.
Some of these men have received permanent physical injuries from the torture they were subjected to. There is, for example, the case of Omar Deghayes, who is now completely blind in one eye because of the torture he endured.
There have been cases where men have died under US detention also. The most shocking is the Qala-i-Janghi massacre known also as the “Convoy of Death”. It is estimated that at least 1500 prisoners died. More about the massacre (which the US has tried very hard to hide) can be found here.

Civilian Casualties
When the war started, the Bush administration assured their own citizens and other people in the West that there would be no civilian casualties. The facts are that more civilians than soldiers have died in this war. Thousands have died, most of them because of US and NATO led air strikes.
The Afghan government constantly appeals to the US and NATO to limit their dependency on air strikes, but to no avail. Air combat is more convenient as it carries much less risk to the lives of soldiers. Unfortunately, it also means that the situation on the ground is more difficult to assess and more mistakes are made.
While NATO tends to support enquires into civilian deaths, the US now have a history of trying to cover them up. One of the famous cases I followed was when they bombed a school in a small village. Around 90 people died in the strike, around 50 of those were children. The US claimed that only around 30 of those were civilians and refused to believe reports of the contrary. The media eventually presented photographic and video evidence.

Atrocities committed by the Taliban

The Taliban have a horrible history of human rights abuses. I could write a much longer list than this if I were to include what they used to do when they ran the government.

Human shields
NATO claims that it has strong evidence that the Taliban have used civilians as “shields”. Apparently, during combat they place themselves in areas which are full of civilians, the aim being to increase civilian deaths and therefore turn more people against the international presence in Afghanistan.

Opium
Afghanistan is the biggest opium producer in the world. It accounts for around 90% of the opium produced in the world today. The government has tried to encourage farmers to go back to farming legal crops, but unfortunately most farmers have little choice. The opium industry finances the Taliban insurgency, which means the Taliban often use force and threats to make sure farmers plant opium. There are also other Taliban related problems which cause farmers to resort to opium - such as a lack of mobility (travelling on most roads is dangerous and farmers need to be able to take food to the marketplace to be able to sell it - with opium this is arranged differently) and a lack of water (opium needs significantly less water than food and the insurgency makes it very difficult to set up the irrigation schemes that are needed to sustain food crops).

Civilian Casualties
While most of the protests have been against the killings of civilians by coalition forces, the Taliban have met with disapproval as well - though not quite on the same scale.
Quite apart from casualties in combat areas, a lot of deaths caused by the Taliban happen in different circumstances. Voting in elections or supporting the government in any other way can mean a death sentence.

Women’s rights
Women’s rights under the Taliban government took a huge blow. Even now the Taliban continue their efforts in stopping women from having any sort of independence. Girls that go to school in areas where the Taliban insurgency is active have had acid thrown into their faces. Their parents and teachers face death threats. In some areas the Taliban even succeed in closing schools for girls.
In many areas women are still scared to leave the house without a male companion and a burkha.

What you can do to help

If you have other propositions for taking action - please post them in the comments :) I rather wish I had more time to research this properly myself :-/

Support Amnesty International’s campaign against torture
For more details see here. For my Polish readers - there is a campaign that we, as Poles, should particularly take notice of. It relates to the investigation into CIA secret prisons in Poland. More about the campaign here.

Support a Women’s Charity in Afghanistan
The women of Afghanistan need help! Many Afghan women are amazingly clever and brave individuals and their involvement in the politics and development of the country could change a lot for the better.
A charity with a long history is RAWA. RAWA does not support any of the major political forces in Afghanistan today. The Taliban, the Northern Alliance, the international forces, the Afghan government… all of these get very negative reviews from RAWA in how they are effecting the lives of Afghan women. Politics is not RAWA’s thing, what they’re concerned with is the plight of Afghan woman and you will find many ways (not necessarily financial) in which you can help them on their site.

Inform yourself further and inform others
The more people care and know about what is happening in Afghanistan, the bigger the chance that we can bring about positive change.

Peace Day in Afghanistan

On a final note, Afghanistan is one of the places where Peace Day has had a significant impact. A short clip about how Peace Day is helping to eradicate polio in the country can be found here. And a great film to watch in this context is The Day After Peace (which I will gladly lend to friends who ask for it). There is hope for Afghanistan yet! :)

Little Fetishes (or why I’ve always been confused about why other girls enjoy looking at photos of celebrities)

This blog post got me thinking way more than I would have ever thought possible - what was originally meant to be just a reply in the comments section there is now turning into a horrendously long blog post ;)
I don’t know if Andreja is reading this… but I’m sure she remembers when she brought me a Shahrukh Khan photo from an Austrian (or was it German?) magazine. It was his Om Shanti Om bare chest look and even though I clearly have a huge thing for him, she got practically no reaction from me (we both laughed she should have given the magazine to a different Monika we both know, who would have been way more appreciative ;)).
The blog post in question is a list of celebrities with explanations on what details the author finds sexy in them (”little fetishes” *grin*) and links to photos to illustrate those features. I read through it with amusement and concluded that I would never be able to write a list like that. I just don’t react to photos in that way and I don’t really find particular kind of facial features sexy.
But as the discussion there continued and I started thinking more about it, I concluded I actually do have “little fetishes”, it’s just that they’re not photogenic. A lot of them have to do with body language rather than looks. And I started wondering - maybe I would be able to make a list like that after all.
So I figured I’d try (as everyone else was making their own attempts in the comment section there and it’s kind of fun ;)) and it’s becoming an alarmingly long list :] I’ve grouped it “by fetish” rather than “by celebrity” cause it was just easier to write that way somehow (but it also means the celebs get repeated multiple times).
So here goes… The “fetishes” are listed in random order.

Fetish no.1 - the only photogenic one
Ryuhei Matsuda - he’s the only celebrity I’ve ever liked who is beautiful to me in the sense that I like to stare at photos of him. He has a face like a porcelain doll, no? *grin*

Fetish no.2 - being politically incorrect (extra points for innuendo, even better if it’s gay ;))
Shahrukh Khan - He has narrowly missed getting sued for some of his jokes (actually, I think there was one he did get sued for - ironically it was kind of mild comparing to some of the other things he’s said and done). I think his politically incorrect humour is also partly why I like him when he’s evil - he has the license to go as far with it as he pleases then ;) He gets the extra points for innuendo too - there’s a reason why he’s the first star in Bollywood to have so many gay rumours about him and it’s not because he’s gay ;)
Daniel Radcliffe - I adore his sense of humour *grin* Though, to be honest, this politically incorrect thing is not even just in his jokes. There are many things he does on purpose just to wind people up. From saying he’s an atheist to making it a point to do Harry Potter publicity in a gay magazine.
Robert Pattinson - he has a slightly different style of political incorrectness than the two above (and is definitely milder on the gay innuendo ;)). But he does some things that neither Radcliffe or SRK would - I mean who in their right mind publically disses their own movies? ;)
I’m sure I could easily fit in more male celebs here, but those were the three that came to mind first - they take it to pretty extreme levels IMO.
I was trying to think of a female celeb who would fit this criteria (the original post includes both genders *grin*) and I couldn’t think of anyone who took it quite far enough and then suddenly it came to me - Mallika Sherawat *grin* She has a beautifully feminist and provocative wit. Having said that - I do think this quality is much rarer in women.
The other lady I can think of who totally has the potential to match the three guys above on political incorrectness is not actually a celeb, but then I only know her from the screen and she has an imdb page - so maybe that’s good enough? ;) I saw Samira Saraya in City of Borders (a documentary) and she is so incredibly hot! I honestly don’t usually have this kind of reaction to women. And thinking back to it, her political incorrectness probably had a lot to do with it ;)

Fetish no.3 - running (and other high energy displays)
I like to see a good running sequence in a film - there are some guys whose running just really does it for me (I don’t think I’ve seen a woman whose run I’ve found particularly sexy though). The problem is that I quickly forget whose running I liked ;)
I’m not usually into very macho kind of running (like conventional action heroes and that sort of stuff). What I like best is when the running is dynamic, but not entirely in control - like maybe the guy trips or has to push through a crowd or something like that.
Other high energy activities also tend to qualify (but I’m just as forgetful as to who I like and why :]).
I think my biggest running fetish is Shahrukh Khan (I actually tend to remember it even when I don’t watch him run for quite a long while ;)). And I know I’m not the only person who has a running fetish when it comes to him cause his director in Kal Ho Naa Ho got a lot of flak for putting in a really ridiculous and illogical running sequence into the film and he admitted that the only reason was because he likes Shahrukh in running scenes lol The running scene that really sticks out in my mind is in Darr (1994). I generally liked his running much better when he was younger I guess. Can’t find the entire scene on-line, but you can see some of what I mean on the trailer. Some short shots from the scene I love are around the 0:30-0:40 mark (it’s a very long and satisfying sequence in the film) and then there’s a different scene, which I also like (though not as much as the first) at the 1:30-1:45 mark. Actually, when Shahrukh first became popular in India his energy was one of the major things that seemed to attract people. I don’t think he’s got anywhere near the energy in his body language nowadays (though I still find his body language very sexy). A favourite scene of mine that really shows off his energy is a dance sequence in Maya Memsaab (one of the first feature films he shot - this was early 90s). You can see it here (I particularly recommend it past the 1:00 mark - I think that’s where the energy is most evident *grin*).
As I’m coming out of a Tom Felton phase, I remember his running ;) I haven’t seen all that much of it (never seen him do a long running sequence), but judging by the little I’ve seen I think he has a lot of potential there *grin* You can see him running (in true cowardly style) on this clip at the end of the snow scene and then there’s a little more after the Hermione punches Draco scene. The snow scene starts around the 2:15 mark and the other one follows it.
I sort of have this recollection that I really liked Brendan Fraser’s running, but I don’t remember it clearly enough and can’t find a clip ;) He’s probably the closest I’ve been to enjoying a very macho kind of run (mind you, as far as action heroes go Brendan Fraser is pretty un-macho ;-P). What I find sexy about him is the size and power of him - like when he runs every step is so ridiculously huge (he looks great when he punches someone too ;)).
I’m sure there’s plenty more guys whose running I’ve enjoyed, but it really is hard to remember…

Fetish no. 4 - the domination/vulnerability dichotomy
The name of this fetish doesn’t make any sense, but I didn’t know how else to call it ;-P I love it when they do the whole “I’m going to intimidate you” thing and I also love to see vulnerability - what’s important is that the same person should be able to do both. Sometimes the vulnerability is enough in itself, but it’s still much better when the intimidating thing is in place too (doesn’t work for me the other way round though). What can be extremely thrilling is when they do both in the same scene *grin* The extremer the contrast, the more thrilling it gets ;) Unfortunately there’s not that many parts around where that’s possible and I tend to think it demands quite a lot of acting skill as well, so this is not something I get to see often *sigh*
Anyway, after Harry Potter 6 I have to say Tom Felton fits the bill perfectly. Ever since the 3rd one I thought he had potential with this (he just didn’t have the material to show it off) and Harry Potter 6 proved I was right! *grin* There’s the scene on the train (where he stamps on Harry’s face) and then the one on one scene with Snape, where you get both sides of the coin very strongly. No clips of these are up on-line yet though. Best I can do is link to the bathroom fight scene, which I don’t like anywhere near as much (and the opening crying shot is kind of fake - it gets better from about the 0:11 mark), but it’s still good :) It’s more on the vulnerable side of things though.
Alan Rickman also really must be mentioned here. I don’t think I need to convince anyone he can do the intimidating strutting thing well. He very rarely gets to do a full on vulnerable part, but what I really love about him is that in all his dominating personas, the vulnerability is usually just under the surface. One of my favourites is Sweeney Todd - Judge Turpin is a very dark and all powerful kind of character and yet when it comes to ladies he’s so adorably vulnerable! There is a shot in the Poor Thing song, which is full on vulnerability (it’s around the 1:30 mark - when he’s under the window with the flowers), but I also love this scene (past the 0:30 mark). Here he’s very much in his intimidating strutting mode and yet that vulnerability is constantly there, right under the surface - I find it really beautiful and sexy :) Btw, I was much amused to hear Tim Burton verbalize all my major Alan Rickman fetishes in an interview once, so I know I’m not the only one who feels that way about him ;)
Unfortunately, I’ve got to mention Shahrukh Khan again here lol And I think this is another reason I like him in villain and anti-hero kind of roles. I mean the only villainish sort of part of his I don’t react particularly strongly to (Baazigar) is the one which doesn’t fill either this fetish or my political incorrectness one :] He’s another guy who can pull off both extremes at the same time, though I can’t find a link with strong support for that :] In the end I chose this Don montage *grin* Don is Shahrukh’s most intimidating character ever I think (he’s usually more popular with the audience in his vulnerable mode), so you can really see that part of it in his body language there. It doesn’t show off his vulnerable mode much, but those can be seen on the Darr trailer and in the Maya Memsaab scene somewhat.
I’ve been thinking about female celebs, but I couldn’t think of anybody who gets this out on quite the same level. There’s plenty of female celebs, who can pull the vulnerability thing off beautifully, but the intimidating thing is very rare. Then again, female characters with very intimidating characteristics are hardly present in films and when they are they’re usually badly written *sigh*

Fetish no. 5 - restrained emotions
Finally a a fetish where Shahrukh does not score top marks ;) A lot of British and Japanese actors score high on this. I love it when they barely change facial expression and yet underneath you can feel there’s so much going on.
Alan Rickman really needs to be repeated here. He has this fantastic quality (which Tim Burton also greatly appreciates ;)), where you look at him and you sort of don’t want to know what he’s thinking. It feels like whatever he’s thinking is so dark, sick and perverted that you just don’t want to know ;) I mean that feeling doesn’t come across in every part - only with his villains really. But I love it. He’s generally a very restrained actor though, so even when there’s nothing perverted about the character it’s still a lot of fun to watch him *grin*
Colin Firth has to be mentioned here. Mr Darcy is a classic and I’m pretty sure the restraint in that part is what attracts a lot of girls - not just me :]
Ryuhei Matsuda’s face is not the only thing that appeals to me ;) He’s one of the most restrained actors out there. I think his part in Gohatto is very unique - it’s probably the least facial expression I’ve ever seen by a leading man ;) and yet he’s magnetic, there’s so much tension there.
Amongst the ladies, Keira Knightley definitely needs a mention - Atonement and The Duchess are amazing parts in this respect. Her restraint in these is very beautiful.

Fetish no. 6 - warmth and personal space
I get a kick out of watching people who are totally unabashed about physically getting into the personal space of others. Somehow, to me these people exude warmth and sexiness. Like the restraint thing, it seems to have a bit of a cultural element to it - or at least I observe this much more often in South Asian, African and Latin looking people.
I have this belief that a major reason why Shahrukh Khan is so successful in playing lovers, despite never having kissed a heroine on screen, is his personal space thing. He gets so much innuendo out of just encroaching on other people’s personal space that he doesn’t actually need to do any kissing ;) Check out the dialogue scene at the beginning of this clip - most of the sexual tension in that is him gradually taking up more and more of the girl’s personal space.
Tony Curtis is quite a character - he may be overweight and over 80, but he just exudes warmth and sexiness. The level of comfort he has with people is beautiful (if you want to check it out then IMO it shows up quite a bit in this interview with Jonathan Ross).
Samira Saraya gets another mention as well. Her comfort levels about this are definitely one of the reasons that make her so sexy to me :) Not enough video of her on-line to link to unfortunately or I would *sigh*
Jaya Bachchan - she’s over 60, but I still find her very sexy. Unfortunately, I can’t find a clip which really shows off what I mean… But I do think one of the reasons people like her so much in motherly roles is how cuddly she is ;)

Final Note: This list is far from full, amazingly enough… I tried to pick people who really embody these “fetishes” for me, but I’m sure I’ve left loads out. And there are also people who don’t exactly embody any of these, but have a little bit of many. And there are also some things about body language that I just can’t be quite this specific about and yet they do seem sexy to me. And there are probably “fetishes” I’ve just forgotten about. So, er yeah, this list isn’t exactly comprehensive ;)

Colin Firth wins Best Actor at the Venice film festival (A Single Man spotted)

{FILM SPOTTING}

A Single Man (USA, 2009)

Release Date (worldwide): Unknown at this time…
Runtime: 99′
Director: Tom Ford
Cast: Colin Firth, Julianne Moore, Matthew Goode, Ginnifer Goodwin, Nicholas Hoult
Production House: Artina Films, Depth of Field, Fade to Black Productions
Plot: (from imdb)

A story that centers on an English professor who, after the sudden death of his partner tries to go about his typical day in Los Angeles.

Trailer

The sceptical part of me thinks that…
Matthew Goode is hijacking too many movies on my watchlist lately ;-P I can’t say I dislike him exactly, but there’s something about him that does put me off a bit…
Having said this, he is the only thing about this movie that I have mixed feelings about. Everything else says “Watch it now!” lol And who knows… maybe Matthew Goode is the right person for this movie?

The excited part of me thinks that…
I’ve been looking forward to this ever since I first heard of the project which was a year or two ago I think. At that time the only person attached to it was Colin Firth and little was known about the film. The basic plot was interesting enough though and Colin Firth just seemed like the perfect person to cast in something like this.
What I didn’t anticipate was that it would be a major winner at the Venice Film Festival! *grin* For me the Venice and Toronto film festivals are ones I particularly trust, so this is really thrilling! And also the trailer just looks amazing! Can’t wait to see this, why doesn’t it have any release dates yet :-/

Free documentary films on-line

Wednesday, 9 September 2009, 11:19 | Category : Crumbs, Film
Tags : ,

Free documentary films is always a good thing, so if you’re interested check out DocBoat, which is an on-line documentary film festival (this year is its first edition :)).

Tom Felton at DragonCon

More and more clips of Tom Felton at DragonCon are popping up on youtube and it just defies belief lol It’s a really crazy interview. From what I can make out, at this time clips of two Q&A sessions have appeared. Two more sessions are still to come I think.
The first Q&A did not receive particularly wide coverage on youtube, but judging by comments from fans it sounds like he loosened up gradually throughout the event and his 2nd Q&A was probably better (although the little I saw of the first looked hilarious too).
The amount of various innuendo in this is amazing *grin* Even when he didn’t put any in intentionally the audience would find something and start giggling. Harry/Draco in particular was a reoccurring theme.
Note to Kin: He really cracked everybody up on the innuendo front when he started talking about Helena Bonham-Carter ;)

In the first Q&A, he had an interesting slip-up which you can see here ;) He’s clearly a guy who likes to swear, but he always tries to keep it clean in the Harry Potter publicity. It was rather amusing to see him embarrassed about slipping up there (though is it just me or would you agree that saying “shit” is far from being a real slip-up? lol). What cracked me up was that by the second Q&A he had almost completely taken his guard down and was using words like “bloody” without apologizing lol
Anyway, here’s the other clip from the first Q&A that I thought was worth a look.

The second Q&A has been covered much more widely on youtube though often the audio and/or video is a bit difficult to make out. The clearest clip I’ve come across so far is this. It includes the previously mentioned Harry/Draco bit, but with more context (he said a bit more about Harry/Draco at that point ;)) and some other questions too.
The whole Q&A, which might be a bit much for most of you (it’s almost an hour) is below. The quality is a bit iffy, but I had no problem making out most of it. If you’d just prefer some short clips (quality is similar) then check some out here.

Tom Felton on the Harry/Draco phenomenon

Tom Felton is doing publicity at Dragoncon in Atlanta at the moment. And finally the fans there have asked what I’ve always wanted to hear ;) Kind of amusing that he’s not had that question pop up in any of the interviews I’ve seen of his before (then again I’ve never heard Daniel Radcliffe being asked about slash either which is even more bizarre I guess) and it sounds like at Dragoncon he’s getting the question at most of the Q&A sessions all of a sudden.
Anyway, below is a clip on which he answers the question *grin*:

I do hope some good video of his Q&A sessions appears on-line. Most of what I’ve come across so far is very bad quality unfortunately (the clip above is one of the few I’ve seen which is decent). But the little of his Q&A sessions that I’ve seen all look hilarious.

Exams = random fixations

Amazingly enough as long as I was working on my BA project I was actually fixating on the project rather than on some random actor I like, but now that I’m having a bit of a break from the project and I’m supposed to be studying for exams (Artificial Intelligence is the one I’m pretending to focus on at the moment), my usual fixations which try to save me from having to concentrate on my exams have returned ;) It’s back to Tom Felton, ladies and gents. Not sure why it’s him again, but there you go ;)
So to celebrate that, below is a video interview, which I overlooked in all of the HBP publicity frenzy. Some interesting stuff there.

Recently, he was doing publicity with Evanna Lynch in Athens (as they only just had the premiere there - I’ve always been amazed at how late Greece gets Hollywood films) and I came across an interview that totally cracked me up. Not because it was any good (rather boring actually), but because I’m starting to think he’s paranoid or something ;) In some interviews (especially the foreign ones) he’s absurdly polite (either that or he’s being very sarcastic and nobody is noticing ;)). But the Greek stuff was particularly funny because he kept coming out with lines like “wow, these Greeks really think of great questions” (after being asked something really lame that he’s been asked many times before) and he didn’t look like he was trying to be sarcastic lol It’s almost like he’s paranoid that people think he’s the same way that Draco Malfoy is and is trying to make sure everyone feels he’s approachable. On the other hand when he tells stories of hate mail, children hiding behind their parents’ legs and getting booed on the streets in the US, maybe it’s the right thing to do ;) Still think the levels he takes his politeness to are a little funny sometimes.
It’s actually rather amazing how strongly he is associated with the part - I remember hearing the guy who plays Fenrir Greyback in Half-Blood Prince saying that he thought Tom Felton would be an awful and very annoying brat and was surprised to find he wasn’t like that at all. It’s kind of strange hearing that from a fellow actor lol

Oh, and I’m really suffering for not having a Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince DVD yet ;) Cause honestly, I think that would be by far the best film to watch on a Tom Felton fixation phase. I have this feeling that he’s going to be my main reason for re-watching that film a lot ;)
I just hope that I don’t get my next Tom Felton phase before the DVD comes out and preferably once the price comes down significantly ;-P So no more Tom Felton phases for the next 1-1.5 years please ;)