An alternative way of looking at death - the two Tibetan Book of the Dead films

{FILM DIARY}

The Tibetan Book of the Dead: A Way of Life (Canada/Japan, 1994)

Seen: Saturday, 14th November 2009 (cinema)
Runtime: 46′
Director: Barrie McLean
Production House: Mistral Films, NHK, National Film Board of Canada (NFB)
Plot: A documentary on death in the Buddhist tradition and how it differs from Western perceptions of death.

Scene From the Film

Impressions In Short
I found the completely different attitude towards death quite fascinating. It was odd to see a film which was so completely about death and yet it was calm and optimistic - it made the thought of death kind of exciting ;)

More About the Film
It’s the first time in ages that me and Kin had significantly different feelings about a film. I think it was because our expectations were very different - I had absolutely no idea such a book even existed, while she’s done some pretty extensive reading on the topic.
The film is more about the “A Way of Life” part of the title than the “Tibetan Book of the Dead” bit. I felt that the book was a sort of excuse to talk about death in a way people in the West aren’t used to talking about it.
It’s shot in two realities. One in Ladakh (a region of India where Tibetan culture has been left relatively unchanged for centuries), where an old man has died and the correct rituals are performed after his death. The other is in North America, where a non-profit organization is trying to spread the idea that death is not something to be feared and is helping people with terminal illnesses to deal with what’s coming.
I thought these complemented each other very well. The scenes from North America were the ones that really carried the message (Western culture needlessly associates death with fear and failure), while the scenes from Ladakh gave it validity. What the film was trying to say felt much more believable to me when I saw so many people living by those ideas - clearly this way of thinking about death can work.

Recommended?
Yes. For me the treatment of death was quite something - I can’t think of another film I’ve seen which portrays death like this.

The Tibetan Book of the Dead: The Great Liberation (1994, Canada/Japan)

Seen: Saturday, 14th November 2009 (cinema)
Runtime: 45′
Director: Barrie McLean
Production House: Mistral Films, NHK, National Film Board of Canada
Plot: A documentary explaining the rituals and concepts about death in the Buddhist tradition.

Scene From the Film

Impressions In Short
Unlike Kin, I liked this one less ;) It concentrated more on the rituals themselves than on the message. Consequently, the whole of it was shot in Ladakh.

More About the Film
In the previous film, the story we got from Ladakh was that of an old man, who had approached the end of his life and died peacefully. The rituals had been performed successfully and he had come to rest in peace.
In this one the premise is different - we follow the death of a man still in his youth, who died very suddenly. The rituals are not met with success and the whole process is therefore much more complex, which gives the film the opportunity to get into much more detail about it all.
Initially this new premise engaged me - there was sort of more suspense to it. But I was soon put off by the differences in the film’s style. For one, it used a very cheesy animated effect - illustrating the dead man’s soul as a naked red figure flying around the room. I found that a bit silly :]
I think I could have stomached that though. What I got really annoyed by was the scenes between the man acting as the spiritual guide and his student. These were clearly staged (not genuine documentary footage) and they looked so fake. Their purpose was, of course, to facilitate the explanation of the process to the viewers, but I found I didn’t really need them. In fact they felt repetitive most of the time. If anything important was missing in the documentary footage, they could have taken advantage of the voice over, so I don’t understand why they resorted to staging stuff.

Recommended?
I’d recommend the first one more. I think this one is primarily for people, who want to understand the rituals better.

First teaser for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I

{FILM SPOTTING}

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I (2010, UK/USA)

Release Date (Poland): Unknown, but my guess based on previous years is 26th November 2010
Release Date (worldwide): 17th November 2010
Runtime: Unknown
Director: David Yates
Cast: Emma Watson, Jamie Campbell Bower, Daniel Radcliffe, Helena Bonham Carter, Ralph Fiennes, Alan Rickman, Bill Nighy, Bonnie Wright, Rupert Grint, Michael Gambon, Tom Felton, Rhys Ifans, John Hurt, Jason Isaacs, Miranda Richardson, Maggie Smith, Robbie Coltrane, David Thewlis, Warwick Davis, Evanna Lynch, Brendan Gleeson, Helen McCrory, Julie Walters, Timothy Spall, Stanislav Ianevski, Imelda Staunton, Clémence Poésy, Richard Griffiths, James Phelps, Chris Rankin, Natalia Tena, Matthew Lewis, Oliver Phelps, Fiona Shaw, Harry Melling, Mark Williams
Production House: Heyday Films, Warner Bros. Pictures
Plot: Voldemort is taking over the world, Dumbledore is not there to stop him. Harry, Hermione and Ron try, despite not knowing how to accomplish this.

Trailer

The sceptical part of me thinks that…
Already having a trailer (or something that resembles one) a year ahead of the release date feels a bit weird, but hey I’m not complaining ;-P (apparently, they’re not even sure when the break between part one and part two is going to happen yet!)
The sceptical part of me is hating the little bit of dialogue that’s on the teaser - John Hurt doing the wise old wizard thing. It’s very hammy - sounds even worse than Michael Gambon’s wise old wizard lines from the Half-Blood Prince trailers. I’m going to hope that they’ve taken the worst lines they possibly could for the trailer and that John Hurt is going to be ok in the film (that was the case with Michael Gambon in Half-Blood Prince ;)). I hate those Hollywood wise old wizard conventions grrrr…
Other than that, I’m not too worried… yet ;) And even if John Hurt is going to ham the whole movie like that (which would be a shame - he’s an excellent actor), then it’s not so important - it’s not like he’s going to have a lot of screen time I don’t think :]

The excited part of me thinks that… My expectations for part one are high - the first half of Deathly Hallows is pretty much my favourite part of any of the books. This is not the case with part two cause the second half of Deathly Hallows is probably my least favourite part of the books ;) Plus the second half is very epic and I don’t believe there’s any chance whatsoever that Hollywood will not go the Hollywood route with the really epic stuff :] Especially not with David Yates directing.
But back to part one… We’re going to get some really nice scenery and a lot more of the Trio in the Muggle world and no more Hogwarts uniforms (Radcliffe and Grint even get to have some stubble *grin*), which I’m pretty excited about. Part one has been described as a road movie by some of the cast and crew, which sounds great to me. I’m already finding all the shots of the cast in such different surroundings very cool *grin*
David Yates has also said he’s going to experiment with a more realistic, naturalistic kind of look (handheld camera and stuff) in part one, which I’m extremely excited about. I like when Hollywood risks that sort of thing and it’s also very much in line with the kind of action that is in that part of the book. So far the teaser isn’t too optimistic in this regard (it’s all big tracking shots on the trailer), but the lighting is a bit different - a bit more in the Prisoner of Azkaban vibe and that I’m very happy about :)
I’m particularly loving the shots in the forest. Plot-wise it’s probably my favourite part of any of the books. It’s basically Harry, Ron and Hermione sitting around in the forest and getting frustrated because they have no idea what to do and absolutely nothing else happens for a long time *grin* Judging by message boards, for most people it’s one of the more boring parts of the books, but I totally loved it. I am worried they might cut a lot of it or add more action and special effects or something like that, but I’m liking the shots so far - they look the most naturalistic of all that’s on the trailer, which is also very appropriate.
I’m naturally excited about lots of other things (there’s more than I can list). The cast is particularly alluring as usual *grin* This one should be totally up Daniel Radcliffe’s sleeve. He’s going to get a lot of angst and drama, which is what he’s best at. Rupert Grint is going to have to branch out a bit. There’s going to be some serious angst and drama for Ron this time round - I’m excited to see how he handles that. David Yates was all praise about him and I have a lot of faith in him, so I think this might be special *grin* And I’m naturally curious to see if Tom Felton is going to continue on the level he was on in Half-Blood Prince. He’s going to get less screen time in this, so it might be more challenging, but on the other hand the scenes he does get are such that he should be able to do something interesting with them *grin* I think Emma Watson having to do some sort of love scene with Daniel Radcliffe is going to be totally hilarious (Ron has a sort of jealousy vision in the books). And I’m really looking forward to the seven Potters scene (they get 6 people to transform to look like Harry to confuse Death Eaters at the beginning of the book). It’s weird to actually be looking forward to a special effect scene - I’m usually dreading those ;)
Oh, and last but not least - it’s so nice to see John Williams doing the score again *grin* I like the way the soundtrack sounds on this trailer - so much better than films 4-6.

Séraphine - the story of Séraphine de Senlis

{FILM DIARY}

Séraphine (France/Belgium, 2008)

Seen: Monday, 9th November 2009 (cinema)
Runtime: 125′
Director: Martin Provost
Cast: Yolande Moreau, Ulrich Tukur
Production House: TS Productions, Climax Films, Région Ile-de-France, Centre National de la Cinématographie (CNC), Angoa-Agicoa, Centre National du Cinéma et de l'Audiovisuel de la Communauté française de Belgique, France 3 Cinéma, La Banque postale Image, Le Tax Shelter du Gouvernement Fédéral de Belgique, Procirep, Programme MEDIA de la Communauté Européenne, Radio Télévision Belge Francophone (RTBF), Soficinéma
Plot: (from imdb)

Based on the life of French painter Séraphine de Senlis.

Trailer

Impressions In Short
A pleasant costume drama with a somewhat depressing (but true) ending.

More About the Film
It’s a nicely shot film with good performances, but it didn’t make a strong impression on me - it was just kind of nice ;)
Seraphine really worked well as a character. In a way it was the classic underdog kind of plot, only it didn’t have a happy ending like most underdog films do *sigh* The character I most felt for, however, was probably not Seraphine, but Wilhelm Uhde. He was an outsider in so many ways - he was homosexual, Jewish and ends up in the unfortunate situation of being a German in France when the war is about to break out. And then on top of that he eventually has to deal with Seraphine’s mental breakdown and the premature death of his lover.

Recommended?
I suppose :) For anyone who likes costume dramas and films about art this will probably be a pleasant viewing.

Accidental Husband or how I’m clearly unromantic - I’d pick the sensible guy not the romantic one ;)

{FILM DIARY}

The Accidental Husband (UK/USA, 2008)

Seen: Wednesday, 4th November 2009 (cinema)
Runtime: 90′
Director: Griffin Dunne
Cast: Uma Thurman, Jeffrey Dean Morgan, Colin Firth, Ajay Naidu, Isabella Rossellini
Production House: Blumhouse Productions, Team Todd, Yari Film Group (YFG)
Plot: (from imdb)

When talk radio host Emma Lloyd advises one of her listeners to break up with her boyfriend, the jilted ex sets about getting his revenge.

Trailer

Impressions In Short
It’s a cute romantic comedy and it was relatively enjoyable, but nothing special. It probably doesn’t help that I would have gone for the other guy ;-P And no, it’s not just because it was Colin Firth that didn’t get the girl ;)

More About the Film
The annoying thing about this film was that I totally agreed with the advice Emma Lloyd gave out on the radio. It wasn’t some sort of radical feminist propaganda, it was just sound and sensible advice. I don’t think looking for a responsible and mature man and basing a marriage on a long, trusting relationship is a bad thing. I think that’s great advice actually.
Not to say that Patrick Sullivan wasn’t charming and loving - he was very much so. But my personal preference is for guys like Richard - sensible, steady and honest. Besides, he and Emma did love each other - just in a different way. And one of the best things about Richard was how much he respected her personal space.
On the plus side of things, they were cast very well and they never made Richard into a vile character. Usually when you have two guys in a romantic comedy one of them turns out to be a baddie. In this one they’re both good, just different. I guess that was kind of nice.

Recommended?
Er no, not really. Though you can watch it for the cast. Colin Firth has great comic timing in this, Jeffrey Dean Morgan really is very charming and Uma Thurman is… well Uma Thurman ;)

Apartment Zero - Colin Firth in an 80s homoerotic art house movie

This is embarrassing - it’s December now and this review is from October *sigh*

{FILM DIARY}

Apartment Zero (UK/Argentina, 1988)

Seen: Saturday, 31st October 2009 (DVD)
Runtime: 124′
Director: Martin Donovan
Cast: Hart Bochner, Colin Firth
Production House: Producers Representative Organization, Summit Company
Plot: Adrian is an English man living in Buenos Aires. His financial situation forces him to rent out a room in his apartment - something he’s rather unwilling to do as he is a very private and isolated man. He has no friends, his neighbours distrust him and the only family member he has is his mother, who is currently in a mental institution. When Jack, an American, moves in, a very strange friendship develops between the two of them. And then there’s plenty of murders in the background ;)

Scene From The Film
This is a scene which happens right after Jack moves into the apartment *grin*

Impressions In Short
The two lead performances are great, but beyond that I thought the film was rather blah…

More About the Film
When browsing A Single Man reviews on imdb, I found a lot of praise for some of Colin Firth’s other performances. There were two that came up extremely often - one was Pride and Prejudice obviously, but the other was a small art house film called Apartment Zero that I’d never even heard of. So naturally I really wanted to see it ;) Having seen it, I totally agree - it’s a rather vulnerable sort of role and he really pulls that off.
I don’t get the opinions about the film though… It seems like most people either love it or hate it and I found it to be just an average weirdo art house movie.
The strong point of the film is the dynamic between the two lead characters. You’ve got Colin Firth pulling off the stiff British thing beautifully as usual and Hart Bochner getting all the American stereotypes out very well too. And they really have great chemistry together. The dialogue helps as well - there’s a lot of opportunity for subtext in it and both of them milk it (just check out the scene I embedded - I found it hilarious ;)). Not that the film goes much further than the subtext (there’s people out there on imdb arguing that there’s no homoerotic vibe in the film at all which I find rather strange :] to me they’re like flirting all the time for the first half of the film ;)).
Apart from the two lead performances and the way the characters are written, I thought the film was just average art house fair though. On the other hand, it seems to have some political tendencies and I didn’t get them at all (I’m historically ignorant as I keep saying *sigh*) - perhaps I would have liked it better if I’d understood that part of it.

Recommended?
Definitely a good watch for Colin Firth fans (and Hart Bochner fans, but I haven’t encountered too many of those :]). Beyond that, I’m not sure… Not something you should stay away from, but I wouldn’t particularly recommend it either.

Some Ashton Kutcher interviews

Thursday, 10 December 2009, 20:27 | Category : Crumbs, Hollywood & the American film industry
Tags : , , , ,

I rather liked him in Spread yesterday, so I watched some of his interviews - this is him on Rove and this is part one and part two of an interview he did on Jonathan Ross.

A little bit of Taylor Lautner news

The big news is that his first post-Twilight movie has been announced - it’s not good news for me and Kin as it sounds like he won’t be losing much muscle ;) He’s playing a superhero.
Also, I came across Taylor Lautner’s appearance on the the Conan O’Brien show *grin* There’s also an amusing clip of Lautner practising the grape catching before the show ;)

FILM SPOTTING: December 2009 in Polish cinemas

{FILM SPOTTING}

(500) Days of Summer (USA, 2009)

Release Date (Poland): 4th December 2009
Release Date (worldwide): 17th January 2009
I originally spotted this in November, but the Polish release date has been moved.

Spread (USA, 2009)

Release Date (Poland): 4th December 2009
Release Date (worldwide): 11th January 2009
Runtime: 97′
Director: David Mackenzie
Cast: Ashton Kutcher, Anne Heche, Margarita Levieva
Production House: Barbarian Films, Katalyst Films, Oceana Media Finance
Plot: (from imdb)

In Los Angeles, Nikki is homeless, car-less and closing in on 30, but he’s amoral, good-looking, and adept in the sack, moving from one wealthy woman of 35 or 40 to another, a kept boy-toy. His newest gig, with Samantha, an attorney whose house overlooks L.A., is sweet, although it’s unclear how long she’ll put up with him. Then Nikki meets Heather, a waitress. Is the player being played, or might this be love? What will Nikki discover?

Trailer

The sceptical part of me thinks that…
If this is indeed a romantic comedy (which is what it’s being marketed as) then it’ll probably be awful. In fact, even if it’s not what it’s being marketed as (and there are some things that point that way), I’m not that sure it’s going to be any good…

The excited part of me thinks that…
I’m always a bit intrigued when I get the vibe that a film is being marketed as something different than it is. That usually means it’s some sort of weirdo film.
The director of this did Young Adam (a small British Ewan McGregor film that became infamous when McGregor’s full frontal was cut for the American release). That’s a film I rather enjoyed and also I can’t quite believe that this guy would just make a standard rom-com/sex comedy kind of flick. Besides, there are no big studios in the credits.
When you delve into the reviews, it gets weirder. A lot of the reviews straight out say that they were expecting to see a sex comedy and the film isn’t even a comedy - let alone a sex one. Most of these reviews totally slam the film of course. Then there are the few reviews that say the film actually has something interesting to say and is pretty daring. But unfortunately even those reviews are rarely positive. A lot of them seem to say that the film starts off really well, but it goes down hill as soon as the protagonist meets the young girl (they start moralizing - he has to be punished for his bad ways).
All in all I’m curious… even though I’m really not sure this film will be any good…

Królik po berlinsku (Poland/Germany, 2009)

Release Date (Poland): 4th December 2009
Runtime: 52′ (+ 25′ - it’s being shown with an animated film entitled Esterhazy)
Director: Bartosz Konopka
Production House: MS Films, Ma.Ja.De Filmproduktion, Telewizja Polska, Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk (MDR), Lichtpunt, Vrijzinnig Protestantse Radio Omroep (VPRO), Polish Film Institute, Media, Andrzej Wajda Master School of Film Directing
Plot: (from imdb)

The untold story about wild rabbits which lived between the Berlin Walls. For 28 years Death Zone was their safest home. Full of grass, no predators, guards protecting them from human disturbance. They were closed but happy. When their population grew up to thousands, guards started to remove them. But rabbits survived and stayed there. Unfortunately one day the wall fell down. Rabbits had to abandon comfortable system. They moved to West Berlin and have been living there in a few colonies since then. They are still learning how to live in the free world, same as we - the citizens of Eastern Europe.

Trailer + Interview

The sceptical part of me thinks that…
My sceptical part is actually relatively quiet about this one ;)

The excited part of me thinks that…
Bartosz Konopka is a pretty interesting documentary director by the accounts I’ve heard (in fact I think I’ve seen a short film of his and it was really good). And this sounds great - it’s a fantastic way of talking about the system changes in Eastern Europe.

Blindsight (UK, 2006)

Release Date (Poland): 11th December 2009
Release Date (worldwide): 11th September 2006
Runtime: 104′
Director: Lucy Walker
Production House: Robson Entertainment
Plot: (from imdb)

Six blind Tibetan teenagers climb the Lhakpa-Ri peak of Mount Everest, led by seven-summit blind mountain-climber Erik Weihenmayer.

Trailer

The sceptical part of me thinks that…
I’m not particularly drawn to the topic matter and the trailer rather put me off.

The excited part of me thinks that…
The film has a lot of awards and positive reviews to its name.

A Single Man - more publicity

Saturday, 5 December 2009, 21:37 | Category : Crumbs, Hollywood & the American film industry
Tags : , , , ,

Another scene from the film has been released and it looks… interesting *grin*
Also, the New York Times did two nice features - one on Colin Firth and one on Tom Ford.

How to find your passion…

Tuesday, 1 December 2009, 22:37 | Category : Crumbs, Uncategorized
Tags :

Just passing on a link :) I really liked that blog post. It’s about breaking out of a certain mindset and the eternal “WTF do I want to do with my life?!” question.